Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> Supreme Court: Americans have right to guns for self-defense by ZYKLON on Jun 26,2008 10:39am
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by ZYKLON at Jun 26,2008 10:39am
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Americans have a right to own guns for self-defense and hunting, the justices' first major pronouncement on gun rights in U.S. history.

The court's 5-4 ruling struck down the District of Columbia's 32-year-old ban on handguns as incompatible with gun rights under the Second Amendment. The decision went further than even the Bush administration wanted, but probably leaves most firearms laws intact.

The court had not conclusively interpreted the Second Amendment since its ratification in 1791. The amendment reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

The basic issue for the justices was whether the amendment protects an individual's right to own guns no matter what, or whether that right is somehow tied to service in a state militia.

Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for four colleagues, said the Constitution does not permit "the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home."

In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority "would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons."

He said such evidence "is nowhere to be found."

Joining Scalia were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. The other dissenters were Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter.

The capital's gun law was among the nation's strictest.

Dick Anthony Heller, 66, an armed security guard, sued the District after it rejected his application to keep a handgun at his home for protection in the same Capitol Hill neighborhood as the court.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in Heller's favor and struck down Washington's handgun ban, saying the Constitution guarantees Americans the right to own guns and that a total prohibition on handguns is not compatible with that right.

The issue caused a split within the Bush administration. Vice President Dick Cheney supported the appeals court ruling, but others in the administration feared it could lead to the undoing of other gun regulations, including a federal law restricting sales of machine guns. Other laws keep felons from buying guns and provide for an instant background check.

Scalia said nothing in Thursday's ruling should "cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons or the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings."

The law adopted by Washington's city council in 1976 bars residents from owning handguns unless they had one before the law took effect. Shotguns and rifles may be kept in homes, if they are registered, kept unloaded and either disassembled or equipped with trigger locks.

Opponents of the law have said it prevents residents from defending themselves. The Washington government says no one would be prosecuted for a gun law violation in cases of self-defense.



toggletoggle post by thuringwethil at Jun 26,2008 10:59am


what a fun world!



toggletoggle post by Conservationist  at Jun 26,2008 11:26am
http://www.amren.com/store/color_of_crime.html

Having read those stats, THANK YOU, I'LL KEEP MY GUNS.



toggletoggle post by Hoser at Jun 26,2008 11:56am
I am extremely happy about this ruling. The Supreme Court finally tells anti-gunners to suck a dick.

If everyone were armed, there would be a hell of a lot less crime.



toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jun 26,2008 1:10pm
Good fucking thing. It's nice to finally see something positive out of the conservative half of the Supreme Court - especially with Obama probably sitting in the White House next year, this should keep the 2nd amendment largley intact for a few.



toggletoggle post by mortalis  at Jun 26,2008 1:32pm
"well regulated militia"

lolwut



toggletoggle post by largefreakatzero at Jun 26,2008 1:55pm
Nice!



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Jun 26,2008 2:32pm
GWB is going to run out and get a gun



toggletoggle post by powerkok   at Jun 26,2008 2:45pm
He already has a gun. Its called the US military.

This is good news indeed.

Just think...if even one of those ppl at VT had a gun, they couldve popped that gook, and maybe saved a few lives.
Or, maybe they would have been shot in the process, but, when youre already dead anyway, why not try.



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:think...type...click
[default homepage] [print][5:20:12pm Apr 26,2024
load time 0.01524 secs/12 queries]
[search][refresh page]