Usually wiki based ecyclopedias aren't all that comprehensive. This one is VERY comprehensive.

http://www.boobpedia.com

Cool idea, but most of the tits on that first page are gross.

most of the boobs on there in general are huge, which people seem to think is gross. there is a large bbw section too.

I don't have a problem with the size at all, they're just misshapen with funky looking nipples.

yeah a lot are. i spent a long time on there last night and there is a fair amount of old women on their too.

I will be conducting most of my research here from now on.

That's a hearty bush.

ZJD said:

True, but the Wiki is for boobs, and those are actually quite nice if you ask me.

Lamp said:

Agreed, I think she's a babe in pretty much all aspects, i was just drawn to the bush. Her boobs are way nicer than most porn boobs.

this thread makes me never want to touch boobs again... yuck.
what a collection of gross tits and disgusting beavers.
real dolls look realler than these zeros

ps: the pool is closed.. please?

I said!

"what a collection of gross tits..." lol

lisa lipps is an uggo

oh and this lady too

I think I just vomited a little in my mouth.

Someone acknowledge the babes I posted so I can go to bed.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fried+eggs+hanging+on+a+nail

the_reverend said:

In this thread? Maybe on the website, but even the happy old lady looks to have ample boob-stability.

Oh, Gianna.

sinistas said:

Haha word up

DAMN STRAIGHT. That's a hell of a woman.

Dude...wtf happened to this bitch's nipples?

Looks like they got hard.

It looks like they got dipped in Nuclear waste...

or chicken pox.

they look fine to me, there are way crazier boobs on there to point out as crazy

Those are montgomery's tubercles. They lubes the boobs for bebe suckling action!
tubercles tubercles tubercles tubercles -- good word

"I'm just saying seventies boobs were different, that's all"

bump because this is still good.