Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> my sister is definitely a better photographer than I am by davefromthegrave on Feb 14,2006 12:02am
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by davefromthegrave  at Feb 14,2006 12:02am
This picture speaks volumes to me, I'm sharing it because I thought some of you might enjoy it as well.





toggletoggle post by Joe/NotCommon   at Feb 14,2006 12:10am
i bet she is also a better lay



toggletoggle post by davefromthegrave  at Feb 14,2006 12:19am
thanks, that's just what I wanted to think about



toggletoggle post by Joe/NotCommon   at Feb 14,2006 12:20am
it's what i've been thinking about all month



toggletoggle post by whiskey_weed_and_women  at Feb 14,2006 12:21am
davefromthegrave said:
think


haha joe made you think



toggletoggle post by Ryan_M at Feb 14,2006 12:39am
it looks very old fashioned, except there's a kid in baggy pants......it is a very good picture though.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 14,2006 12:57am
if you want an honest critique photo-wise... not that I'm at all, but it's pretty OOF.

it also looks like it was just grayscaled. this makes the image a lot flatter that it would be is you use a channel mixer for mesh down the colors to grays. you can really bring out colors and then change them in to shades for the b/w.

it needs a sharpening over all cause there is a lot of "digital clouding" in there.

I'm not saying it's a bad photo, it just needs a little photoshopping.
I cleaned out all the things that I said above and cut it by 50% to take out some of the OOF. email me and I'll send you the photo. oh, I also warmed it up a touch.



toggletoggle post by whiskey_weed_and_women  at Feb 14,2006 1:05am
post it here, i wanna see



toggletoggle post by davefromthegrave  at Feb 14,2006 1:07am
the_reverend said:
if you want an honest critique photo-wise... not that I'm at all, but it's pretty OOF.

it also looks like it was just grayscaled. this makes the image a lot flatter that it would be is you use a channel mixer for mesh down the colors to grays. you can really bring out colors and then change them in to shades for the b/w.

it needs a sharpening over all cause there is a lot of "digital clouding" in there.

I'm not saying it's a bad photo, it just needs a little photoshopping.
I cleaned out all the things that I said above and cut it by 50% to take out some of the OOF. email me and I'll send you the photo. oh, I also warmed it up a touch.

yeah, please post it. damn, you are quick. It was actually taken with a 35mm analog camera, with black and white film. thanks Rev, I'm sure my sister will appreciate.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 14,2006 1:19am
when you scan things you need to sharpen them or you get a graying of the image.

let's see, I balanced the levels (they weren't bad)
USM'd it at 13% 31pt
resized by 50%
placed a warming filter on it of 19%
USM'd it at 15% 10pt



toggletoggle post by davefromthegrave  at Feb 14,2006 1:26am
I have no idea what any of that means



toggletoggle post by davefromthegrave  at Feb 14,2006 1:26am
thanks again though



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 14,2006 1:35am
translation: a sharper looking image.



toggletoggle post by davefromthegrave  at Feb 14,2006 1:37am
the print wasn't so bad, but after I scanned it and hosted it on tinypic it wasn't looking quite so good.



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:Heavy Necromonic Prey
[default homepage] [print][9:20:47am Mar 28,2024
load time 0.01142 secs/15 queries]
[search][refresh page]