Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by ShadowSD at 2012-10-07 16:37:23

Burnsy said	[orig][quote]
Yes, he should have burned down Congress lol. Glad we figured it out. Cheers.

Ha, fair enough. I'm not trying to be a smart ass (well any more than usual), I just honestly wonder what the suggested alternative approach for him was that would have been better. He only said change was hard and takes a long time in the '08 campaign more times than I can count. Clinton, for all the good I agree that he did, never leveled with us like than when he ran in '92. Change is good was all there was, with no effort to temper those expectations; Obama, who actually was pretty honest in speech after speech that change is frustrating and takes time, is rarely remembered for it, and everyone's like Randy Marsh in that episode of South Park after the '08 election.

My point is that I can accept the argument of Obama should have done a and not b. But when there's never a plausible a suggested, that's where I don't understand the logic. Cheers.

[default homepage]

[print][

11:48:33am May 04,2024
load time 0.00722 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]