Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by ShadowSD at 2006-07-20 12:22:35

Dissector said:

It was a combination between the guy who ran it being a fuckwad and that there were only about 3 or 4 good bands out of 28.

Well I mentioned above five bands that I would classify as very good, and six or seven that would at least fall under the category of good, but of course these things are always to some degree a matter of opinion.

I also thought Jay was pretty cool to us, and managed to plan and run the fest without being a hard ass to the bands, but maybe others were treated differently because we already knew him and had worked with him previously? But I looked at it this way, he was able to put together a show with local bands and a HUGE overhead, and still break even. Anyone who has accepted the financial risks of putting on a fest knows that that's a huge accomplishment.

Most importantly, though, I have to point out that no one would still be arguing about a two year old show if the spambots hadn't bumped this thread again.

[default homepage]

[print][

12:18:11am Apr 29,2024
load time 0.00660 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]